- Liberty, freedom and civil rights? Do any of us understand these things anymore.
- Democracy and rights under threat in corporate police state
- Put the Nats last or lose your rights to protest
- The forest wars are back, time to mobilise
- Elections as far as the eye can see
- New Green shoots beginning to emerge
- Is Australia really this conservative?
- Individualism, is it just-a consolation prize?
- Three corrupt sectors that distort our economy
- Algorithms for Change – Politics in the Pub
- Now more than ever: non-violence and positive change
- Challenging times ahead, we need to build unity in diversity
- Hung parliament: An outbreak of democracy.
- The future of Capitalism, Democracy and Activism in Australia
- Political donations the essence of corruption
- For sale: your right to protest
- NSW addicted to old habits
- Senate voting reform causes a flurry
- Prohibition, it begins and ends with violating our rights
- Roadside drug tests a big fail
- Climate change, think globally respond regionally
- People power not pollies kept us gasfield free
- The perfect storm: Shenhua and the Liverpool Plains – Mick Daley
- Sovereignty at stake in TPP
- High Noon in the Nthn Rivers: Metgasco Vs Everybody Else
- Rapid Onset Fascism
- Metgasco vs the people
- When injustice becomes the law
- Activism and social movements, an eternal part of human evolution
- Gloucester Dreaming ~ guest post by Mick Daley
- …more commentary
- News & Events
- Bob Brown Is Taking “Shocking” Anti-Protest Laws To The High Court
- Anti protest laws could arrest nannas, seize tractors
- “They blinked first”
- Colin Barnett quick to protest against ‘activism degrees’ – The Australian, 16/10/2014
- ‘Degrees in activism’ put brake on growth – The Australian, 15/10/2014
- Magistrate throws out vexatious police case against CSG protesters
- Outrage over school PR ‘by stealth’- The Northern Star
- CSG clash a certainty
- Communities use new tactics
- Gas group attacks lecturer
- …more media
- Activist Resources
No-one seriously disagrees with getting actual drug-impaired drivers off the road. The rules for alcohol and other drugs should be the same. Unfortunately the current drug testing regime in NSW is a debacle, it has lost its connection to the aim of road safety and is bringing the law into disrepute. The current testing processes leave everybody; drivers, police and the Courts having to guess just what the tests are detecting and for how long they can record minute traces of prior drug use.
If people are going to be subjected to forced swabs, and the loss of their driving licence there is an obligation to provide a coherent , evidence-based and transparent rationale for the process. When the laws were passed, the stated intention was to detect ‘active’ drugs that were impairing drivers. Instead, the testing is so finely tuned that no-one accurately knows how far back it is picking up prior use, passive smoking or false positives. It is not acceptable to misuse a law designed for road safety as a trojan horse for zero tolerance prohibition.
Earlier this week a Lismore driver was acquitted by the Local Court despite a positive test for the presence of cannabis because the Court found that he honestly and reasonably had relied on representations made by police about how long cannabis remained detectable in saliva following consumption. The NSW government’s own road safety website advises that cannabis can only be detected for up to 12 hours after consumption. This driver had not smoked cannabis for a week and half prior to the swab.
The knee jerk argument of “smoking pot is illegal anyway” is not an acceptable excuse for the maladministration of our road safety laws. By using test kits that are massively oversensitive for the legislative purpose that justifies them, the drug testing regime has become a perversion of justice.
Drug prohibition and road safety are separate issues. Prohibition is a globally discredited policy from which most civilised nations are currently beating a hasty retreat. Road safety on the other hand does matter, and we are entitled to a system of drug and alcohol testing that is conducted in good faith, and with accurate equipment that actually tests for driver impairment.
As it now stands a serious question mark hangs over every prosecution under these laws and the government needs to go back to the drawing board.
This article was originally published in the Northern Rivers Echo on February, 2016.